這篇文章給大家介紹一文帶你讀懂Java中的動態(tài)代理,內(nèi)容非常詳細,感興趣的小伙伴們可以參考借鑒,希望對大家能有所幫助。

創(chuàng)新互聯(lián)公司自2013年起,是專業(yè)互聯(lián)網(wǎng)技術(shù)服務(wù)公司,擁有項目網(wǎng)站制作、成都做網(wǎng)站網(wǎng)站策劃,項目實施與項目整合能力。我們以讓每一個夢想脫穎而出為使命,1280元奎屯做網(wǎng)站,已為上家服務(wù),為奎屯各地企業(yè)和個人服務(wù),聯(lián)系電話:18982081108
要想了解Java動態(tài)代理,首先要了解什么叫做代理,熟悉設(shè)計模式的朋友一定知道在Gof總結(jié)的23種設(shè)計模式中,有一種叫做代理(Proxy)的對象結(jié)構(gòu)型模式,動態(tài)代理中的代理,指的就是這種設(shè)計模式。
在我看來所謂的代理模式,和23種設(shè)計模式中的“裝飾模式”是一個東西。23種設(shè)計模式中將它們作為兩種模式,網(wǎng)上也有些文章講這兩種模式的異同,從細節(jié)來看,確實可以人為地區(qū)分這兩種模式,但是抽象到一定高度后,我認為這兩種模式是完全一樣的。因此學會了代理模式,也就同時掌握了裝飾模式。
代理模式
代理模式簡單來說,就是對一個對象進行包裝,包裝后生成的對象具有和原對象一樣的方法列表,但是每個方法都可以是被包裝過的。
靜態(tài)代理
讓我們先來看一段代碼:
package common;
public class Test {
static interface Subject{
void sayHi();
void sayHello();
}
static class SubjectImpl implements Subject{
@Override
public void sayHi() {
System.out.println("hi");
}
@Override
public void sayHello() {
System.out.println("hello");
}
}
static class SubjectImplProxy implements Subject{
private Subject target;
public SubjectImplProxy(Subject target) {
this.target=target;
}
@Override
public void sayHi() {
System.out.print("say:");
target.sayHi();
}
@Override
public void sayHello() {
System.out.print("say:");
target.sayHello();
}
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
Subject subject=new SubjectImpl();
Subject subjectProxy=new SubjectImplProxy(subject);
subjectProxy.sayHi();
subjectProxy.sayHello();
}
}這段代碼中首先定義了一個Subject接口,接口中有兩個方法。
然后定義了SubjectImpl類實現(xiàn)Subject接口并實現(xiàn)其中的兩個方法,到這里肯定是沒問題的。
現(xiàn)在再定義一個SubjuectImplProxy類,也實現(xiàn)Subject接口。這個SubjectImplProxy類的作用是包裝SubjectImpl類的實例,它的內(nèi)部定義一個變量target來保存一個SubjectImpl的實例。SubjectImplProxy也實現(xiàn)了接口規(guī)定的兩個方法,并且在它的實現(xiàn)版本中,都調(diào)用了SubjectImpl的實現(xiàn),但是又添加了自己的處理邏輯。
相信這段代碼不難理解,它通過對SubjectImpl進行包裝,達到了給輸出內(nèi)容添加前綴的功能。這種代理方式叫做靜態(tài)代理。
動態(tài)代理
從上面的演示中我們不難看出靜態(tài)代理的缺點:我們對SubjectImpl的兩個方法,是進行的相同的包裝,但是卻要在SubjectImplProxy里把相同的包裝邏輯寫兩次,而且以后如果Subject接口再添加新的方法,SubjectImplProxy也必須要添加新的實現(xiàn),盡管SubjectImplProxy對所有方法的包裝可能都是一樣的。
下面我把上面例子的靜態(tài)代理改成動態(tài)代理,我們來看一下區(qū)別:
package common;
import java.lang.invoke.MethodHandle;
import java.lang.reflect.InvocationHandler;
import java.lang.reflect.Method;
import java.lang.reflect.Proxy;
public class Test {
static interface Subject{
void sayHi();
void sayHello();
}
static class SubjectImpl implements Subject{
@Override
public void sayHi() {
System.out.println("hi");
}
@Override
public void sayHello() {
System.out.println("hello");
}
}
static class ProxyInvocationHandler implements InvocationHandler{
private Subject target;
public ProxyInvocationHandler(Subject target) {
this.target=target;
}
@Override
public Object invoke(Object proxy, Method method, Object[] args) throws Throwable {
System.out.print("say:");
return method.invoke(target, args);
}
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
Subject subject=new SubjectImpl();
Subject subjectProxy=(Subject) Proxy.newProxyInstance(subject.getClass().getClassLoader(), subject.getClass().getInterfaces(), new ProxyInvocationHandler(subject));
subjectProxy.sayHi();
subjectProxy.sayHello();
}
}只看main方法的話,只有第二行和之前的靜態(tài)代理不同,同樣是生成一個subjectProxy代理對象,只是生成的代碼不同了。靜態(tài)代理是直接new 一個SubjectImplProxy的實例,而動態(tài)代理則調(diào)用了java.lang.reflect.Proxy.newProxyInstance()方法,我們來看一下這個方法的源碼:
public static Object newProxyInstance(ClassLoader loader,
Class<?>[] interfaces,
InvocationHandler h)
throws IllegalArgumentException
{
if (h == null) {
throw new NullPointerException();
}
/*
* Look up or generate the designated proxy class.
*/
Class<?> cl = getProxyClass(loader, interfaces); //獲取代理類的Class
/*
* Invoke its constructor with the designated invocation handler.
*/
try {
Constructor cons = cl.getConstructor(constructorParams); //constructorParams是寫死的:{ InvocationHandler.class },上邊返回的代理類Class一定是extends Proxy的,而Proxy有一個參數(shù)為InvocationHandler的構(gòu)造函數(shù)
return cons.newInstance(new Object[] { h }); //這里通過構(gòu)造函數(shù)將我們自己定義的InvocationHandler的子類傳到代理類的實例里,當我們調(diào)用代理類的任何方法時,實際上都會調(diào)用我們定義的InvocationHandler子類重寫的invoke()函數(shù)
} catch (NoSuchMethodException e) {
throw new InternalError(e.toString());
} catch (IllegalAccessException e) {
throw new InternalError(e.toString());
} catch (InstantiationException e) {
throw new InternalError(e.toString());
} catch (InvocationTargetException e) {
throw new InternalError(e.toString());
}
}上面的 Class<?> cl = getProxyClass(loader, interfaces); 調(diào)用的getProxyClass方法:
public static Class<?> getProxyClass(ClassLoader loader,
Class<?>... interfaces)
throws IllegalArgumentException
{
if (interfaces.length > 65535) { //因為在class文件中,一個類保存的接口數(shù)量是用2個字節(jié)來表示的,因此java中一個類最多可以實現(xiàn)65535個接口
throw new IllegalArgumentException("interface limit exceeded");
}
Class<?> proxyClass = null;
/* collect interface names to use as key for proxy class cache */
String[] interfaceNames = new String[interfaces.length];
// for detecting duplicates
Set<Class<?>> interfaceSet = new HashSet<>();
//驗證interfaces里的接口是否能被類加載器加載,是否是接口,是否有重復(fù)的
for (int i = 0; i < interfaces.length; i++) {
/*
* Verify that the class loader resolves the name of this
* interface to the same Class object.
*/
String interfaceName = interfaces[i].getName();
Class<?> interfaceClass = null;
try {
interfaceClass = Class.forName(interfaceName, false, loader);
} catch (ClassNotFoundException e) {
}
if (interfaceClass != interfaces[i]) {
throw new IllegalArgumentException(
interfaces[i] + " is not visible from class loader");
}
/*
* Verify that the Class object actually represents an
* interface.
*/
if (!interfaceClass.isInterface()) {
throw new IllegalArgumentException(
interfaceClass.getName() + " is not an interface");
}
/*
* Verify that this interface is not a duplicate.
*/
if (interfaceSet.contains(interfaceClass)) {
throw new IllegalArgumentException(
"repeated interface: " + interfaceClass.getName());
}
interfaceSet.add(interfaceClass);
interfaceNames[i] = interfaceName;
}
/*
* Using string representations of the proxy interfaces as
* keys in the proxy class cache (instead of their Class
* objects) is sufficient because we require the proxy
* interfaces to be resolvable by name through the supplied
* class loader, and it has the advantage that using a string
* representation of a class makes for an implicit weak
* reference to the class.
*/
List<String> key = Arrays.asList(interfaceNames); //使用interfaces列表作為key緩存在cache里,也就是實現(xiàn)了相同interfaces的代理類只會創(chuàng)建加載一次
/*
* Find or create the proxy class cache for the class loader.
*/
Map<List<String>, Object> cache;
synchronized (loaderToCache) {
cache = loaderToCache.get(loader);
if (cache == null) {
cache = new HashMap<>();
loaderToCache.put(loader, cache);
}
/*
* This mapping will remain valid for the duration of this
* method, without further synchronization, because the mapping
* will only be removed if the class loader becomes unreachable.
*/
}
/*
* Look up the list of interfaces in the proxy class cache using
* the key. This lookup will result in one of three possible
* kinds of values:
* null, if there is currently no proxy class for the list of
* interfaces in the class loader,
* the pendingGenerationMarker object, if a proxy class for the
* list of interfaces is currently being generated,
* or a weak reference to a Class object, if a proxy class for
* the list of interfaces has already been generated.
*/
//看看緩存里有沒有,如果有就直接取出來然后return,否則判斷根據(jù)pendingGenerationMarker判斷是否有其它線程正在生成當前的代理類,如果有則cache.wait()等待,如果沒有則創(chuàng)建。
synchronized (cache) {
/*
* Note that we need not worry about reaping the cache for
* entries with cleared weak references because if a proxy class
* has been garbage collected, its class loader will have been
* garbage collected as well, so the entire cache will be reaped
* from the loaderToCache map.
*/
do {
Object value = cache.get(key);
if (value instanceof Reference) {
proxyClass = (Class<?>) ((Reference) value).get();
}
if (proxyClass != null) {
// proxy class already generated: return it
return proxyClass;
} else if (value == pendingGenerationMarker) {
// proxy class being generated: wait for it
try {
cache.wait();
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
/*
* The class generation that we are waiting for should
* take a small, bounded time, so we can safely ignore
* thread interrupts here.
*/
}
continue;
} else {
/*
* No proxy class for this list of interfaces has been
* generated or is being generated, so we will go and
* generate it now. Mark it as pending generation.
*/
cache.put(key, pendingGenerationMarker);
break;
}
} while (true);
}
//確認要生成的代理類所屬的包,如果interfaces里所有接口都是public的,代理類所屬包就是默認包;如果有interface不是public,那么所有不是public的interface必須在一個包里否則報錯。
try {
String proxyPkg = null; // package to define proxy class in
/*
* Record the package of a non-public proxy interface so that the
* proxy class will be defined in the same package. Verify that
* all non-public proxy interfaces are in the same package.
*/
for (int i = 0; i < interfaces.length; i++) {
int flags = interfaces[i].getModifiers();
if (!Modifier.isPublic(flags)) {
String name = interfaces[i].getName();
int n = name.lastIndexOf('.');
String pkg = ((n == -1) ? "" : name.substring(0, n + 1));
if (proxyPkg == null) {
proxyPkg = pkg;
} else if (!pkg.equals(proxyPkg)) {
throw new IllegalArgumentException(
"non-public interfaces from different packages");
}
}
}
if (proxyPkg == null) { // if no non-public proxy interfaces,
proxyPkg = ""; // use the unnamed package
}
{
/*
* Choose a name for the proxy class to generate.
*/
long num;
synchronized (nextUniqueNumberLock) {
num = nextUniqueNumber++;
}
String proxyName = proxyPkg + proxyClassNamePrefix + num; //生成代理類的名字,proxyPkg是上面確定下來的代理類所在的包名,proxyClassNamePrefix是寫死的字符串“$Proxy”,num是一個全局唯一的long型數(shù)字,從0開始累積,每次生成新的代理類就+1,從這里也能看出生成的動態(tài)代理類的數(shù)量不能超過Long.maxValue
/*
* Verify that the class loader hasn't already
* defined a class with the chosen name.
*/
/*
* Generate the specified proxy class.
*/
byte[] proxyClassFile = ProxyGenerator.generateProxyClass(
proxyName, interfaces); //生成一個以proxyName為類名的,實現(xiàn)了Interfaces里所有接口的類的字節(jié)碼
try {
proxyClass = defineClass0(loader, proxyName,
proxyClassFile, 0, proxyClassFile.length); //加載生成的類
} catch (ClassFormatError e) {
/*
* A ClassFormatError here means that (barring bugs in the
* proxy class generation code) there was some other
* invalid aspect of the arguments supplied to the proxy
* class creation (such as virtual machine limitations
* exceeded).
*/
throw new IllegalArgumentException(e.toString());
}
}
// add to set of all generated proxy classes, for isProxyClass
proxyClasses.put(proxyClass, null);
} finally {
/*
* We must clean up the "pending generation" state of the proxy
* class cache entry somehow. If a proxy class was successfully
* generated, store it in the cache (with a weak reference);
* otherwise, remove the reserved entry. In all cases, notify
* all waiters on reserved entries in this cache.
*/
//創(chuàng)建成功,則將cache中該key的pendingGenerationMarker替換為實際的代理類的弱引用,否則也要清除pendingGenerationMarker標記;不管是否成功,都要執(zhí)行cache.notifyAll(),讓其它要創(chuàng)建相同代理類并且執(zhí)行了cache.wait()的線程恢復(fù)執(zhí)行。
synchronized (cache) {
if (proxyClass != null) {
cache.put(key, new WeakReference<Class<?>>(proxyClass));
} else {
cache.remove(key);
}
cache.notifyAll();
}
}
return proxyClass; //最后返回代理類Class
}到這里,我們已經(jīng)把動態(tài)代理的java源代碼都解析完了,現(xiàn)在思路就很清晰了:
Proxy.newProxyInstance(ClassLoader loader,Class<?>[] interfaces,InvocationHandler h) 方法簡單來說執(zhí)行了以下操作:
1.生成一個實現(xiàn)了參數(shù)interfaces里所有接口且繼承了Proxy的代理類的字節(jié)碼,然后用參數(shù)里的classLoader加載這個代理類。
2.使用代理類父類的構(gòu)造函數(shù) Proxy(InvocationHandler h)來創(chuàng)造一個代理類的實例,將我們自定義的InvocationHandler的子類傳入。
3.返回這個代理類實例,因為我們構(gòu)造的代理類實現(xiàn)了interfaces(也就是我們程序中傳入的subject.getClass().getInterfaces())里的所有接口,因此返回的代理類可以強轉(zhuǎn)成Subject類型來調(diào)用接口中定義的方法。
現(xiàn)在我們知道了用Proxy.newProxyInstance()返回的subjectProxy可以成功強轉(zhuǎn)成Subject類型來調(diào)用接口中定義的方法了,那么在調(diào)用方法后,代理類實例怎么進行處理的呢,這就需要看一下代理類的源碼了。但是代理類是程序動態(tài)生成字節(jié)碼加載的,怎么看源碼呢?沒關(guān)系,可以在main方法中加入System.getProperties().put(“sun.misc.ProxyGenerator.saveGeneratedFiles”,”true”),這樣就會把生成的代理類Class文件保存在本地磁盤上,然后再反編譯可以得到代理類的源碼:
package common;
import java.lang.reflect.InvocationHandler;
import java.lang.reflect.Method;
import java.lang.reflect.Proxy;
import java.lang.reflect.UndeclaredThrowableException;
public final class $Proxy0 extends Proxy
implements Test.Subject
{
private static Method m4;
private static Method m1;
private static Method m3;
private static Method m0;
private static Method m2;
static
{
try {
m4 = Class.forName("Test$Subject").getMethod("sayHello", new Class[0]);
m1 = Class.forName("java.lang.Object").getMethod("equals", new Class[] { Class.forName("java.lang.Object") });
m3 = Class.forName("Test$Subject").getMethod("sayHi", new Class[0]);
m0 = Class.forName("java.lang.Object").getMethod("hashCode", new Class[0]);
m2 = Class.forName("java.lang.Object").getMethod("toString", new Class[0]);
} catch (Exception e) {
throw new RuntimeException(e);
}
}
public $Proxy0(InvocationHandler paramInvocationHandler)
{
super(paramInvocationHandler);
}
public final void sayHello()
{
try
{
this.h.invoke(this, m4, null);
return;
}
catch (RuntimeException localRuntimeException)
{
throw localRuntimeException;
}
catch (Throwable localThrowable)
{
throw new UndeclaredThrowableException(localThrowable);
}
}
public final boolean equals(Object paramObject)
{
try
{
return ((Boolean)this.h.invoke(this, m1, new Object[] { paramObject })).booleanValue();
}
catch (RuntimeException localRuntimeException)
{
throw localRuntimeException;
}
catch (Throwable localThrowable)
{
throw new UndeclaredThrowableException(localThrowable);
}
}
public final void sayHi()
{
try
{
this.h.invoke(this, m3, null);
return;
}
catch (RuntimeException localRuntimeException)
{
throw localRuntimeException;
}
catch (Throwable localThrowable)
{
throw new UndeclaredThrowableException(localThrowable);
}
}
public final int hashCode()
{
try
{
return ((Integer)this.h.invoke(this, m0, null)).intValue();
}
catch (RuntimeException localRuntimeException)
{
throw localRuntimeException;
}
catch (Throwable localThrowable)
{
throw new UndeclaredThrowableException(localThrowable);
}
}
public final String toString()
{
try
{
return (String)this.h.invoke(this, m2, null);
}
catch (RuntimeException localRuntimeException)
{
throw localRuntimeException;
}
catch (Throwable localThrowable)
{
throw new UndeclaredThrowableException(localThrowable);
}
}
}我們可以看到代理類內(nèi)部實現(xiàn)比較簡單,在調(diào)用每個代理類每個方法的時候,都用反射去調(diào)h的invoke方法(也就是我們自定義的InvocationHandler的子類中重寫的invoke方法),用參數(shù)傳遞了代理類實例、接口方法、調(diào)用參數(shù)列表,這樣我們在重寫的invoke方法中就可以實現(xiàn)對所有方法的統(tǒng)一包裝了。
總結(jié)
動態(tài)代理相對于靜態(tài)代理在使用上的優(yōu)點主要是能夠?qū)σ粋€對象的所有方法進行統(tǒng)一包裝,而且后期被代理的類添加方法的時候動態(tài)代理類不需要改動。
缺點是要求被代理的類必須實現(xiàn)了接口,因為動態(tài)代理類在實現(xiàn)的時候繼承了Proxy類,java不支持多繼承,因此動態(tài)代理類只能根據(jù)接口來定義方法。
最后動態(tài)代理之所以叫做動態(tài)代理是因為java在實現(xiàn)動態(tài)代理的時候,動態(tài)代理類是在運行時動態(tài)生成和加載的,相對的,靜態(tài)代理類和其他普通類一下,在類加載階段就加載了。
關(guān)于一文帶你讀懂Java中的動態(tài)代理就分享到這里了,希望以上內(nèi)容可以對大家有一定的幫助,可以學到更多知識。如果覺得文章不錯,可以把它分享出去讓更多的人看到。
網(wǎng)站名稱:一文帶你讀懂Java中的動態(tài)代理
文章位置:http://chinadenli.net/article44/jhjoee.html
成都網(wǎng)站建設(shè)公司_創(chuàng)新互聯(lián),為您提供自適應(yīng)網(wǎng)站、全網(wǎng)營銷推廣、網(wǎng)站設(shè)計、網(wǎng)站內(nèi)鏈、微信公眾號、App設(shè)計
聲明:本網(wǎng)站發(fā)布的內(nèi)容(圖片、視頻和文字)以用戶投稿、用戶轉(zhuǎn)載內(nèi)容為主,如果涉及侵權(quán)請盡快告知,我們將會在第一時間刪除。文章觀點不代表本網(wǎng)站立場,如需處理請聯(lián)系客服。電話:028-86922220;郵箱:631063699@qq.com。內(nèi)容未經(jīng)允許不得轉(zhuǎn)載,或轉(zhuǎn)載時需注明來源: 創(chuàng)新互聯(lián)